Using your mobile phone or computer to send, take or download nude or sexual images photos, videos and more is a crime if the image includes a person under The law says this is publishing, producing or possessing child pornography. This might include nude, sexual or indecent images using a computer, mobile phone or other electronic device. Sexting is a crime if you intentionally distribute an intimate image of a person under 18 to others, even if they agree to the sext message being sent. You could also be charged by police with child pornography offences. The maximum penalty for this offence is two years jail.
Follow The Verge online:
Threatening to send a sext message
We use cookies and other tracking technologies to improve your browsing experience on our site, show personalized content and targeted ads, analyze site traffic, and understand where our audiences come from. To learn more or opt-out, read our Cookie Policy. A woman has sued Reddit for allowing an ex-boyfriend to repeatedly post pornographic images of her as a year-old. The woman is seeking a class action suit representing anyone who had similar photos or videos posted on Reddit while they were under 18 years of age.
Cookie banner
Jump to navigation. Are laws in California of the United States different from other places in this regard? I appreciate you reaching out to us with your questions, and please understand that we are not a legal service and cannot give you a full and thorough answer about what you're asking as an attorney would. We can give you more general information, but I think that it may be helpful for you to reach out to a lawyer to discuss your specific questions. I know that can feel difficult, but you can use language like, "If someone was doing [
Following years of Internet outrage and one breathless expose by Anderson Cooper, Reddit no longer allows sexually exploitative content featuring children and teens. If you find specific content that meets this definition please message the moderators of the subreddit, and the admins. These are a few of the examples listed Sunday in the forums of Something Awful , another community site, which seems instrumental in Reddit's change of policy. As a private business, Reddit is under no burden to provide a venue for free speech, or facilitate the exploitative images. Still, the site restated its commitment to such an open community in its policy-change announcement: "We are adamant about not limiting the ability to use the Reddit platform even when we do not ourselves agree with or condone a specific use. In allowing users to post sexual images of children on the site however, Reddit did agree and condone the content, in the opinion of many, including Something Awful user Tony Danza Clause, who launched the Something Awful thread preceding Reddit's policy change. Here's the self-explanatory post topic: "This thread is about Reddit actively trading irrefutable child porn. This isn't about the legal grey area subreddits. Reddit is blatantly posting child pornography. Reddit states in its policy change announcement that while it follows legal guidelines, filtering borderline content has become untenable:.
